<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sales Force Automation Diagnostic Question #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prairieskygroup.com/2010/09/27/sales-force-automation-diagnostic-question-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prairieskygroup.com/2010/09/27/sales-force-automation-diagnostic-question-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 20:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prairie Sky Group</title>
		<link>http://prairieskygroup.com/2010/09/27/sales-force-automation-diagnostic-question-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prairie Sky Group]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieskygroup.com/?p=281#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, I agree that everyone has a process.  The measure of whether that process is working is whether &quot;stuff&quot; is getting sold.  So the term &quot;effective&quot; might be a better wrod thatn &quot;real&quot;.

In my view the problem occurs for SFA when everyone in an organization has a completely different sales process.  This makes it more difficult to set up the SFA so that it works for everyone.   

Talking about sales process and SFA process can trend to what I call &quot;process bigotry&quot;.  I&#039;ve given that up long ago.  It&#039;s the results that count.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I agree that everyone has a process.  The measure of whether that process is working is whether &#8220;stuff&#8221; is getting sold.  So the term &#8220;effective&#8221; might be a better wrod thatn &#8220;real&#8221;.</p>
<p>In my view the problem occurs for SFA when everyone in an organization has a completely different sales process.  This makes it more difficult to set up the SFA so that it works for everyone.   </p>
<p>Talking about sales process and SFA process can trend to what I call &#8220;process bigotry&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve given that up long ago.  It&#8217;s the results that count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://prairieskygroup.com/2010/09/27/sales-force-automation-diagnostic-question-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairieskygroup.com/?p=281#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next question really ought to be...what does a &#039;real&#039; sales process look like? Everyone has a process, it may be ad-hoc or impossible to name so if the process is so important can we all agree on what makes a process &#039;real&#039;?

Interesting question, I&#039;m going to have to see if I can write that answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next question really ought to be&#8230;what does a &#8216;real&#8217; sales process look like? Everyone has a process, it may be ad-hoc or impossible to name so if the process is so important can we all agree on what makes a process &#8216;real&#8217;?</p>
<p>Interesting question, I&#8217;m going to have to see if I can write that answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
